15 November 2012
Concord
Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Securities Lending default image

CCPs do not conform


The heterogeneous nature and diverse ownership of central counterparties (CCPs) worldwide mean that they do not conform with regulatory initiatives to impose a single framework for operations and risk management, according to a new report.

Research firm Finadium interviewed major CCPs worldwide to find out how they view the role of collateral for both risk management and as a potential competitive lever in the marketplace.

Its subsequent report—CCPs and the Business of Collateral Management—was released on 15 November.

Stock, options and futures exchanges own 60 percent of recognised CCPs, said the report. “This ownership structure makes CCP activity part of the strategic direction of the exchange itself; decisions made at the exchange level trickle down as opposed to CCP decisions trickling up.”

Boards of industry representatives or outside parties run the remaining 40 percent.

“These ownership structures complicate the process of categorising the intentions of the CCP community; some CCPs operate truly as utilities for the benefit of their users while others are inclined towards market growth through acquisitions and new product development. Further, many exchanges including the CME, ICE and London Stock Exchange are competitive, publicly traded entities, putting their fully owned CCP functions in a competitive position as well.”

While different CCPs offer a range of services for user convenience and as a competitive differentiator, “CCPs worldwide are not necessarily converging to provide one set of advanced functionalities”, said the report.

“CCPs universally say that they are looking to provide efficient services, but the definition of efficiency may vary depending on local market conditions. institutions typically called CCPs may also not be counterparties for every product; some organisations may simply offer clearing, reporting and collateral management services but may leave the counterparty risk to the original trading parties. These variations are important to remember for both users and regulators.”

More Industry news
The latest news from Securities Lending Times
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Hedge funds see record-breaking returns, says eVestment
26 September 2017 | Atlanta | Reporter: Jenna Lomax
Investors added an estimated $13.4 billion to hedge funds in August, bringing in more money than was spent, which lead total AUM to $3.2 trillion
US Volcker Rule not fit for purpose, says SIFMA
22 September 2017 | New York | Reporter: Drew Nicol
The US Volcker Rule is too broad, excessively complex, and uniquely prescriptive, according to the Securities Industry and Financial Markets Association
Pirum joins South African securities lending association
21 September 2017 | Johannesburg | Reporter: Drew Nicol
Pirum Systems has joined the South African Securities Lending Association
EquiLend and Trax partner for SFTR solution
20 September 2017 | London | Reporter: Drew Nicol
Trax and EquiLend are joining forces to tackle SFTR reporting requirement with a a full front-to-back solution for mutual clients
ISLA confirms BoE conference keynotes
19 September 2017 | London | Reporter: Jenna Lomax
Sarah John, head of sterling markets division, and Jon Pyzer, senior manager for the sterling markets division will speak to attendees on 12 October
UCITS funds enjoy assets boom in Q2
18 September 2017 | Brussels | Reporter: Jenna Lomax
The latest growth figures represent the highest level of net sales recorded since Q1 2015
ESMA releases responses from CCP’s conflict of interest report
15 September 2017 | Paris | Reporter: Jenna Lomax
As part of the consultation, ESMA proposed giving further counsel to CCP’s management to “ensure common, uniform and consistent application” of EMIR guidelines