15 November 2012
Concord
Reporter: Mark Dugdale
Securities Lending default image
CCPs do not conform
The heterogeneous nature and diverse ownership of central counterparties (CCPs) worldwide mean that they do not conform with regulatory initiatives to impose a single framework for operations and risk management, according to a new report.

Research firm Finadium interviewed major CCPs worldwide to find out how they view the role of collateral for both risk management and as a potential competitive lever in the marketplace.

Its subsequent report—CCPs and the Business of Collateral Management—was released on 15 November.

Stock, options and futures exchanges own 60 percent of recognised CCPs, said the report. “This ownership structure makes CCP activity part of the strategic direction of the exchange itself; decisions made at the exchange level trickle down as opposed to CCP decisions trickling up.”

Boards of industry representatives or outside parties run the remaining 40 percent.

“These ownership structures complicate the process of categorising the intentions of the CCP community; some CCPs operate truly as utilities for the benefit of their users while others are inclined towards market growth through acquisitions and new product development. Further, many exchanges including the CME, ICE and London Stock Exchange are competitive, publicly traded entities, putting their fully owned CCP functions in a competitive position as well.”

While different CCPs offer a range of services for user convenience and as a competitive differentiator, “CCPs worldwide are not necessarily converging to provide one set of advanced functionalities”, said the report.

“CCPs universally say that they are looking to provide efficient services, but the definition of efficiency may vary depending on local market conditions. institutions typically called CCPs may also not be counterparties for every product; some organisations may simply offer clearing, reporting and collateral management services but may leave the counterparty risk to the original trading parties. These variations are important to remember for both users and regulators.”

More Industry news
The latest news from Securities Lending Times
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
Lombard completes last piece of Colline services puzzle
23 February 2017 | London | Reporter: Drew Nicol
Lombard Risk has bolted on a new exchange-traded derivatives module to its flagship Colline platform
Clearstream’s securities financing volumes dip
21 February 2017 | Frankfurt | Reporter: Drew Nicol
Volumes in Clearstream’s securities finance business fell 5 percent in January
ETF lending on the rise, says M'Rabti
20 February 2017 | Brussels | Reporter: Drew Nicol
Agent lenders are “getting serious” about including exchange-traded funds in their lending programmes thanks to a transactional hurdles being removed, according to Euroclear’s Mohamed M'Rabti
EXCLUSIVE: Zirpolo leaves Cantor Fitzgerald
20 February 2017 | New York | Reporter: Drew Nicol
Cantor Fitzgerald’s managing director and head of stock loan Rory Zirpolo has left the firm
Hedge funds come out swinging in 2017
17 February 2017 | London | Reporter: Drew Nicol
Strong gains across all hedge fund strategies and regions last month could repair investor confidence and stem the heavy outflows of capital, according to Preqin
CFTC offers respite from 1 March margin rules deadline
15 February 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Drew Nicol
Swaps dealers have been gifted a seven-month grace period to finalise their compliance infrastructures for the new variation margin requirements set to come into force on 1 March
EU repo caught in ‘perfect storm’
14 February 2017 | London | Reporter: Drew Nicol
The European repo market experienced extreme volatility and dislocation during a year-end liquidity crunch in 2016, according to the International Capital Market Association