22 February 2017
London
Reporter: Drew Nicol

OFR: Margin requirements must rise to avoid amplifying market shocks


Market regulators must raise margin requirements for over-the-counter derivative transactions in order to address their procyclical nature and avoid amplifying liquidity issues during stress scenarios, according to the US Office of Financial Research (OFR).

In a recent research paper, the OFR examined the problem of setting margin levels that are high enough to reduce credit exposure yet stable enough to mitigate unintended procyclicality.

“The growing use of margin requirements in over-the-counter derivative transactions reduces counterparty credit risk but may amplify shocks to the financial system through margin calls when volatility spikes,” explained Paul Glasserman and Qi Wu, the paper’s authors.

“In times of higher market volatility, price changes are larger, so the minimum level of margin required to cover potential price changes with high confidence must also be larger.”

“This dynamic can, however, have a destabilising effect on financial markets. With risk-sensitive margin requirements, a spike in volatility leads to margin calls on the firms trading through a CCP or bilaterally.”

“The increase in volatility is likely to be correlated with other indicators of market stress, in which case these firms would need to post additional collateral precisely when it becomes most difficult to raise cash or other liquid assets.”

The paper proposes shifting to ‘through the cycle’ margin levels that are less sensitive to day-to-day market conditions and therefore less prone to spike at the onset of market stress.

“The cost of this added stability is that margin levels need to be higher in quiet times and may seem unnecessarily high as memories of past volatility fade,” the authors added.

The paper also raises questions over the competence of the current EU rules regarding requirements of central counterparties adopt at least one of three suggested methods to minimise procyclicality.

“These rules are vague and therefore open to interpretation, despite the specificity suggested by the numerical values associated with the three options. The rules also fail to differentiate between features of different asset classes.”

More regulation news
The latest news from Securities Lending Times
Join Our Newsletter

Sign up today and never
miss the latest news or an issue again

Subscribe now
SEC launches new 2018 disclosure forms
15 August 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Drew Nicol
New securities lending disclosure forms Forms N-1A, N-3 and N‑CSR are now in play for open-end and closed-end funds in the US, as of 1 August
DC Circuit orders review of OCC’s capital plan
10 August 2017 | Chicago | Reporter: Drew Nicol
The US Court of Appeals for the DC Circuit has called on the US SEC to reconsider its premature acceptance of OCC’s amended capital plan
Electronic repo trading on the rise, says Bruni
04 August 2017 | New York | Reporter: Jenna Lomax
“Many factors” — but particularly the new margin requirements for over-the-counter (OTC) derivatives—are driving the trend
ISLA welcomes asset segregation opinion
02 August 2017 | London | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
The International Securities Lending Association has welcomed an opinion that will clarify asset segregation and the application of depository rules to central securities depositories
FDIC tells firms to prepare for T+2
31 July 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Mark Dugdale
US financial services firms should take appropriate steps to ensure they are prepared for the move to T+2 settlement on 5 September
US regulators to work together on Volcker Rule
28 July 2017 | Washington DC | Reporter: Stephanie Palmer
Five US federal financial regulatory agencies are coordinating the efforts to review the regulatory treatment of certain foreign funds under Section 619 of the Dodd-Frank Act, better known as the Volcker Rule
BoE refines margin liquidity risk assessment proposals
18 July 2017 | London | Reporter: Drew Nicol
Securities financing margin liquidity risk assessments should be based on historical margin posted, with a stress uplift applied, according to the Bank of England’s Prudential Regulation Authority